(I can not remember which RA I used for this blog @-@)
Table 1 shows a brief comparison between traditional L1 cache scheme and newly emerged approach with cache Locking technique. As we can see, the hit ratio of the proposed strategy is higher than the traditional approach. Besides, it is also notable that a maximum hit ratio, 0.946, would be achieved when 25% L1 cache is locked. Therefore, it is observed that the new scheme with cache locking technique offers higher hit ratio, better performance, than the random scheme.
Table 1 shows a brief comparison between traditional L1 cache scheme and newly emerged approach with cache Locking technique. As we can see, the hit ratio of the proposed strategy is higher than the traditional approach. Besides, it is also notable that a maximum hit ratio, 0.946, would be achieved when 25% L1 cache is locked. Therefore, it is observed that the new scheme with cache locking technique offers higher hit ratio, better performance, than the random scheme.
Figure 2 illustrates how total power consumption decreases when L1 locked cache size increased. It is noted that, the power consumption of proposed block selection scheme is lower than traditional randomly selected blocks for all cases.
Table 3 shows the condition of sales about two models, 10.A33 and 12.C19. As shown in the Table, we can observe that although both of the models experienced dramatic increase in their sales from 2009 to 2012, Model 12.C19 still has a better sale in general. And we can easily conclude that the market demand of Model 12.C19 is relative high, comparing to another model.
没有评论:
发表评论